Craig Keener on the darkness of violent evil and the war in Ukraine

 https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2022/february-web-only/russia-ukraine-war-demons-angels-present-global-darkness.html

The Atonement - What Did God Accomplish?

 

                                              (I took this photo of Maracas Bay in Trinidad)

Greg Boyd writes:

Through the incarnation, life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ the infinitely wise God solved a number of problems. Among other things, 

• through Christ God defeated the devil and his cohorts (Heb 2: 14; 1 Jn 3: 8);
• revealed the definitive truth about himself (Rom 5: 8, cf. Jn 14: 7-10); 
• reconciled all things, including humans, to himself (2 Cor 5: 18-19; Col 1: 20-22);
•  forgave us our sins (Acts 13: 38; Eph 1: 7); 
• healed us from our sin-diseased nature (1 Pet 2: 24); 
• poured his Spirit on us and empowered us to live in relation to himself (Rom 8: 2-16); 
• and gave us an example to follow (Eph 5: 1-2; 1 Pet 2: 21). 
• 
  
• Greg concludes that "God’s wisdom is displayed in a “rich variety” indeed!"

From Beilby and Eddy, The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views, p. 23

***

I'll be making posts on the Atonement through Good Friday.

If you want to dig deeper, see the Beilby and Eddy book.

See William Lane Craig, The Atonement.

Facebook "Likes" and Adulation Addiction

(Plaque, in a store in Cleveland)

It’s our generation’s crack cocaine. 

People are addicted. 

We experience withdrawals. 

We are so driven by this drug, 

getting just one hit elicits truly peculiar reactions. 

I’m talking about Likes. 

They’ve inconspicuously emerged as the first digital drug to dominate our culture.

Adam Alter, quoting Rameet Chawla, in Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked, pp. 128-129.  

Facebook, and social media, allow me to communicate ideas (when my blog posts appear on FB), communicate with my Redeemer family, show and receive photos to and from people I care about, and other good things. Social media has a significant upside. It's also creating a world of adulation addicts. I feel the pull myself.

Mike Bickle, in Growing In the Prophetic, writes of a time when he was traveling with John Wimber, speaking regularly before crowds of thousands of people. Mike found that "I enjoyed the attention and honor more than I realized." (143) For followers of Jesus, this is not good. 

Bickle says, "We didn't have enough spiritual maturity to discern some basic warning signals about pride." (144) This is a dangerous spiritual condition to be in! ("O come, let us adore (like) me.") Pride is the oppositional emotion. (See James 4:6.)

We all need affirmation. We don't need to be worshiped. We do need to feel appreciated. We don't need adoration and adulation. 

There is a fine line between affirmation and adulation. The healthy glow of affirming words can morph into self-worship addiction. When we become attached to the affirmation we live for it, rather than living selflessly for God and others. As Jesus hung on the cross, how many "likes" would he have received?

Affirmation-as-adulation can become a drug, and off we go fishing for the next fix. One way to fish for praise is to perform before others. When the presence of God ends, the performance before others begins. At this point all of life's a stage, and we await the reviews.

How can we get off the crack cocaine Facebook offers us? Solitude with God can break us of this. By "solitude" I include "Internet solitude," meaning not getting alone with your laptop, but retreating from it. Go apart from persons and media and laptops and texting and tweeting so God can love you even when you are not performing. It is in that quiet place with God that I hear His "well done," and "John, I love you." 

He likes me. When I am discovered by God, and find my life's worth in being His beloved child, I am released to love and serve others apart from any performance review.

***
Here are Dr. Kimberly Young's Five Signs of Facebook Addiction. (I'm quoting in full.)

In my practice, I have found five key signs of Social Media Addiction that hold true and to illustrate, I am using Facebook Addiction to describe the signs demonstrate obsessive or compulsive behavior:

1. You spend a lot of time thinking about Facebook or planning how to use it. You feel a preoccupation to using Facebook or the immediate need to share. This may result in over-sharing. In an age of privacy, over-sharing stems from saying too much and then regretting what we said. Those who suffer from an addiction do not always judge what is appropriate or inappropriate to post due to their preoccupation with checking and responding, which leads to a constant engagement in the activity.

2. You feel an urge to use Facebook more and more. This means checking out for any updates to your newsfeed or responses to your posts every time you do not know what to do. In other words, the default choice for your free time activity is to be on Facebook. You may leave your Facebook open in the background, switch between work or class assignments to the page every few minutes. Even when you are outside enjoying a drink with a friend, you log in to the Facebook app on your smartphone every now and then during brief moments of non-interactions.

3. You use Facebook in order to forget about personal problems. One aspect of addiction is the ability to use the behavior as a psychological escape from problems. A person may had job or relationship problems and the addiction becomes a convenient way to temporarily soothe the underlying stress created by the problem. When using Facebook as an addiction, the user is distracted in whatever it is he or she is doing and finds it hard to be fully present at the moment. For addicts, they may take a significantly longer amount of time to complete simple tasks or maybe some of their friends may complain that they don’t pay enough attention to what they say. The use of Facebook then becomes a distraction from problems because one’s attention is always diverted with its use.

4. You become restless or troubled if you are prohibited from using Facebook. With addiction, there is an element of withdrawal. We associated with withdrawal from drugs and alcohol and not necessarily behaviors but studies show that people can also go through withdrawal from additive behaviors like Pathological Gambling. When we talk about Facebook addiction, you may start to feel anxious if you can’t access your network. Perhaps you are someplace without cell service, people who feel addicted start to become restless or feel depressed when they are forced to go without access to Facebook.

5. You use Facebook so much that it has had a negative impact on your relationships. As you get used to communicating on Facebook via messaging, sharing photos and posts, commenting and ‘liking’ others, it may come to a point when you get more comfortable socializing online than offline. You become over-reliant on Facebook to fulfill your social needs and may start sacrificing the time spent on real-life meet-ups for coffee with your friends. The behavior becomes unhealthy such that you become uncomfortable or fearful with face-to-face communication, which is a far richer experience than communicating online where one cannot actually see non-verbal communication as in the body language, gestures, and voice tones.

Atonement - The Death of Jesus on a Cross Heals the Separation Between Us and God

 

                                                      (I took this off the coast of Boston.)

Progressives refer to atonement theory as “cosmic child abuse.” Former Christian musician Michael Gungor says “that God needed to be appeased with blood is not beautiful. It’s horrific.” (In Alisa Childers, Another Gospel?, p. 201)

This is progressive Christianity, re-interpreting the cross to be palatable to our secular culture.

Alisa Childers writes: Despite the abundance of biblical testimony, "the one thing that virtually all progressive Christian thought leaders agree on is that Jesus didn’t die to pay the penalty for our sin. He was crucified by an angry mob for speaking truth to power, and his love and forgiveness toward those who killed him is the example we all should follow. According to progressive Christians, Jesus didn’t need to die, but he submitted himself to the will of the people. According to their wisdom, the historic view makes God nothing more than an abusive father.” (Childers, p. 206)

If Christ did not die to atone for our sins, which have separated us from God, then... 

... What could Isaiah have been thinking when he wrote, “Your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you” (Isa. 59:2).

... When Romans 3:23 tells us that “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God,” how does “fallen short” not imply separation from the glory of God?

... How does the biblical idea of “repentance” [TURN!] make any sense if unrepentance (holding on to sin) is not widening the separation between us and a holy God?

... What meaning can “reconciliation” have if it doesn’t imply two separated, at-odds-with-each-other, beings?

... What sense will Romans 5:10 have if, we have never been separated from God? For if, while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life!

Doesn’t the idea of gaining access to peace with God (shalom, like two separated hands coming together in a handshake) imply a condition of not being at peace with God? Like, enemies of God?

Are there not “sheep” and “goats?” (To Jesus, G-O-A-T doesn’t mean “greatest of all time.”)

Will not there be, at the final judgment, a great separation of humanity from God or, as C.S. Lewis called it, a “great divorce?”

Is not some kind of atonement required, as it says in Romans 3:25-26?

25 God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— 26 he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.

And then there is the parable of the prodigal son, whose sinful choices separated him from his loving father.

          And the joyful response of his father when the son returns home.

A denial of the atoning work of Christ, to pay the penalty we deserved because of our sin, is heterodoxy.

 

HERE IS WHAT I BELIEVE…

I believe all have sinned, and fall short of the glory of God.

I believe sin makes a separation between us and God, and us and others. (The wages of sin is death.)

I believe God hates sin.

I believe God’s holiness cannot be grasped without comprehending the nature of sin.

I believe the fundamental reason for the OT sacrifices is atonement, so that sinners could be forgiven by the holy One.

I believe the suffering of the Messiah was clearly prophesied. (See Isaiah 53. See The Gospel According to Isaiah.)

I believe Christ died for our sins.

I believe it was the will of God to die in the place of sinners.

I believe that the Cross was God’s idea.

I believe it was God who died in our place.

(From Piippo, Deconstructing Progressive Christianity, p. 111). Kindle Edition.

 

To dig deeper, read chapter 8 in Deconstructing Progressive Christianity.

And... 

The Atonement, by William Lane Craig

Atonement and the Death of Christ, by William Lane Craig

The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views, ed. by James Beilby and Paul Eddy

Five Views on the Extent of the Atonement, ed. Andrew Louth

Hearing God Is in Proportion to Intimacy with God

 

                                                              (River walk, in Monroe)

I hear and understand my wife Linda's voice because I spend time with her talking and listening. The more familiar I am with her, the more I dwell with her, the more I am able to discern her voice from other voices.

The same goes for my relationship with God. 

To hear the voice of God don't focus on hearing God, focus on your connection with God. Dwell in his presence. Abide in Christ. Out of the dwelling, abiding relationship we learn to recognize and understand the voice of God.

Hearing God is in proportion to intimacy with God.

Conversely, when intimacy is low discernment is low. 

The growing ability to discern what God is saying in the prayer relationship comes from much conversational time with God. As Henri Nouwen writes: "Once we have committed ourselves to spending time in solitude, we develop an attentiveness to God's voice in us." (From Making All Things New, cited in Nouwen, Seeds of Hope, 64)

New Book on Religious Experiences

This past weekend Linda and I were privileged to be with fifty American Baptist pastors and leaders. The two-day retreat was in Indiana. Linda and I led worship (what a great worshiping group!). I taught two sessions on the Presence-Driven Church.

One point I emphasized was that experience, not theory, breeds conviction. The presence of God is accompanied by experiencing God.

I have for decades, studied presence-of-God literature, and the nature of religious experience. (See here.) 

I am now reading Harold Netland's Religious Experience and the Knowledge of God. The Christianity Today interview with Netland is here - "Religious Experiences are Common. Which Ones Should We Trust?" Excellent material!

Note: I also value logic. I taught logic for eighteen years at Monroe County Community College.

RENEWAL SCHOOL OF MINISTRY - SPRING CLASSES BEGIN MARCH 20

 

RENEWAL SCHOOL OF MINISTRY COURSE OFFERINGS

THE WINTER TERM WILL START MARCH 20 ,2022

The following courses will be offered in the next Term

The Class Syllabuses can be found here or click on the course name

The Class Times are 8 PM EDT, 7 PM CDT, 6 PM MDT, 5 PM PDT.

  

1. Church History and Polity - Pastor Ed Owens

  Sunday night @ 8 PM ET Starting March 20 - April 24, 2022

2. Christianity, Culture and Politics - Dr John Piippo

  Monday night @ 8 PM ET Starting  March 21 - April 25, 2022

3. Navigating Conflict - Pastor Steve Malson

 Tuesday night @ 8 PM ET Starting March 22 - April 26, 2022 

4. Missions, Evangelism and Discipleship - Dr Clayton Ford

  Thursday night @ 8 PM ET Starting  March 24 - April 28, 2022

2 Hour Seminar

How to Minister to Addicted People - Pastor Pam Wantz

Saturday April 2, 2022 @ 11:00 AM ET

Register here - https://holyspiritrenewalministries.ticketspice.com/rsom-spring-2022

Nietzche's Parable of the Madman (Video)

I taught this in my Philosophy of Religion classes at Monroe County Community College.

The Return of Sin & the Return of God

(Lake Michigan sunset, St Joseph, Michigan)

As I write, Russia has invaded Ukraine. A forty-mile-long caravan of Russian war machines is heading towards Kyiv. 

Last evening Linda and I saw, on more than one news station,  a six-year-old girl who lay on a table, mortally wounded by a Russian missile. Near by, her mother held her hand over her face and wept.

This invasion is morally wrong. Objectively so. Which means it is morally wrong for anyone to do such things. I agree. Yet how strange it is to make objective moral judgments in a nation of moral relativists.

Christians call it "sin." A long time ago clinical psychiatrist Karl Menninger wrote a book called Whatever Became of Sin? I remember reading it when I was in seminary.

Well, it's back. The events in Europe show that a vast majority of people believe in sin, or something very close to it. 

The biblical Greek word for sin, hamartano, means "to miss the mark." The idea is that there is a moral target to aim at. To miss the target is to "sin."

For example, someone who loots and burns buildings and robs innocent people of their means of income is sinning. There's a moral target out there, and they have missed it.

Or, for example, the police officer who killed George Floyd, in the act of doing so, sinned. He missed the moral point.

What is interesting to me is that people who believe, as I do, that Thou shalt not loot and burn buildings for non-redemptive purposes is wrong, and who believe Thou shalt not murder is morally wrong, believe such things are wrong, objectively.

That is, they seem to believe that these moral targets are true for all persons, and that no one should engage in them, and that those who do should be tried and punished. That is, they believe in some objective standard of justice. (One very good book to understand "justice" is Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?, by Harvard jurisprudential professor Michael Sandel.)

An "objective truth" is a truth that, if true, is true for everyone, whether they believe in it or not. An example of an objective truth is Abraham Lincoln was once President of the United States. That statement, if true (which it is), is true for everyone.

So, the belief that Racism is wrong is a moral claim that, if true, is true for everyone. It's a target all should aim their hearts and minds and behaviors toward.

What's interesting here is that, in America, most people are moral relativists. That is, they do not believe objective moral values exist. But if they protest and hold signs saying Racism is wrong, then they tacitly reveal their true belief in objective moral values. They believe there is no moral target for all to aim at, while lifting up signs that identify the moral target all should aim at. Some accuse evangelical Christians of being dogmatic, and are themselves dogmatic about this. (This drives philosophers like myself crazy!)

If moral relativism is true, if objective moral values do not exist, then "right" and "wrong" are subjective values. They are like personal tastes. So, if you think Racism is not wrong, and I am a moral relativist who believes moral values can be "right for me but wrong for you," then I cannot hold you morally responsible for your affirmation of racism.

But you, dear reader, affirm the moral claim Racism is wrong. You hold racism to be wrong universally. It functions like a commandment for you.

Hence, the return of sin. 

And, the return of God. Because objective moral values find no epistemic warrant outside the existence of God. Anyone who thinks otherwise is, at best, a Platonist (moral values have objective ontological status), and, at worst, morally incoherent. (See here.)

You Belong to God

 

                                                                   (Monroe County)

I receive daily devotionals from Henri Nouwen. Here is yesterday's.

You Belong to God

You are not what you do, although you do a lot. You are not what you have collected in terms of friendships and connections, although you might have many. You are not the popularity that you have received. You are not the success of your work. You are not what people say about you, whether they speak well or whether they speak poorly about you. All these things that keep you quite busy, quite occupied, and often quite preoccupied are not telling the truth about who you are. I am here to remind you in the name of God that you are the Beloved Daughters and Sons of God, and that God says to you, “I have called you from all eternity and you are engraved from all eternity in the palms of my hands. You are mine. You belong to me, and I love you with an everlasting love.”