(Our church yard)
A follower of Jesus will not abuse people verbally.
For biblical reasons like these.
There is one whose rash words are like sword thrusts, but the tongue of the wise brings healing. —Proverbs 12:18 (ESV)
The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks. —Luke 6:45
I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak. —Matthew 12:36
If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person’s religion is worthless. —James 1:26
A word out of your mouth may seem of no account, but it can accomplish nearly anything—or destroy it! It only takes a spark, remember, to set off a forest fire. A careless or wrongly placed word out of your mouth can do that. By our speech we can ruin the world, turn harmony to chaos, throw mud on a reputation, send the whole world up in smoke and go up in smoke with it, smoke right from the pit of hell. - James 3:4–6, The Message
The tongue runs wild, a wanton killer. With our tongues we bless God our Father; with the same tongues we curse the very men and women he made in his image. Curses and blessings out of the same mouth! - James 3:7–10 (Emphasis mine.)
Not only is verbally abusing people unbiblical, it is irrational.
I taught logic for seventeen years at Monroe County Community College. Logic is the tool by which a person formulates and evaluates arguments.
Logical arguments can go wrong in at least two ways. They can go wrong formally. That is, if a logical form is invalid (for deductive arguments) or weak (for inductive arguments. Like this.
1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.
2. The ground is wet.
3. Therefore, it is raining.
This argument fails formally. The conclusion does not logically follow from the premises, because it's logical form is invalid.
Then, therre are arguments that commit an informal fallacy. (There are many types of informal fallacies.) Like this.
1. X is a total idiot.
2. Therefore, his argument against abortion is false.
That argument commits what is called an ad hominem abusive fallacy. The truth or falsity of an argument has nothing to do with whether or not the argument-maker is an idiot.
An ad hominem fallacy attacks the person who makes an argument. That's illogical. The rule is: attack the argument, not the person. And let your attack be moral and logical.
Name-calling and person-denigrating is logically irrelevant, and thereby fails to support a conclusion.
Add to this name-calling as unbiblical and morally wrong, and we have two powerful reasons, for someone who self-refers as a Jesus-follower, to abtain from degrading people made in the image of God.





