Holier Than Thou: How God's Holiness Helps Us Trust Him
By Jackie Hill Perry
Linda recently finished Perry's recent book and loved it!
Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For
Holier Than Thou: How God's Holiness Helps Us Trust Him
By Jackie Hill Perry
Linda recently finished Perry's recent book and loved it!
Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For
In technology, in medicine, in the sciences, humanity has progressed. For example, when I was in grad school at Northwestern University, I bought a refurbished IBM Selectric typewriter for $900. This thing was heavy enough to do serious medieval damage to anything it was launched at. My dissertation was 450 pages long. If I had to edit something on page 20, guess what I had to do. I typed and re-typed and re-typed my doctoral dissertation on this thing which, at the time, was state of the art. Thankfully, at this moment, I am writing this post on my Asus laptop computer.
That's technological progress. But humanity, as a whole, has not morally and spiritually progressed. I am calling this anthropic non-progressivism. Here's an example from Walter Rauschenbusch's Christianity and the Social Crisis. He writes,
"History is never antiquated, because humanity is always fundamentally the same. It is always hungry for bread, sweaty with labor, struggling to wrest from nature and hostile men enough to feed its children. The welfare of the mass is always at odds with the selfish force of the strong. The exodus of the Roman plebeians and the Pennsylvania coal strike, the agrarian agitation of the Gracchi and the rising of the Russian peasants—it is all the same tragic human life.
(Rauschenbusch, Christianity and the Social Crisis in the 21st Century: The Classic That Woke Up the Church, p. 1.)
![]() |
| (Sunset, Monroe County) |

(Monroe county)
A friend recommended David Gushee's Changing Our Minds to me. Gushee supports same-sex marriage.
I haven't changed my mind, even after reading Gushee's book. Textually, marriage is between a man and a woman.
New Testament scholar (which Gushee isn't; and, BTW, neither am I) Robert Gagnon was unimpressed. (Gagnon's massive The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics, is essential reading in this area.) In a review, Gagnon writes:
"Dr. Gushee carries no "intellectual heft" on the issue of Scripture and homosexuality, for two simple reasons:
(1) Dr. Gushee is heavily dependent on the "wet-behind-the-ears" Matthew Vine for his "exegesis" of biblical texts pertaining to the issue of homosexuality; and
(2) Dr. Gushee has ignored nearly all the major arguments against his embarrassingly bad exegesis, even when I sent him links to online articles that summarize more extensive arguments in my published work."
One of Gushee's most disappointing chapters is called "Two Odd Little Words," on the meaning of arsenokoites and malakoi. Gushee says, because we cannot know the meaning of these words, we cannot use them in an argument against same-sex marriage. I find his reasoning absurd.
So does Gagnon (and many New Testament scholars, which I have named elsewhere). Gagnon writes (I quote him at length):
"Dr. Gushee was trying to argue that these terms had to do only with exploitative forms of homosexual practice. It was clear that he had no personal facility with Greek and was significantly dependent on Matthew Vines (who likewise has no personal facility in Greek). The research, such as it was, was amateurish and unworthy of a scholar."
Gagnon continues,
"I sent him a private message on FB, asking him that if he was not willing to take an hour or two to read my 33-page analysis of these two terms in The Bible and Homosexual Practice (303-36), he might at least look at a 5 page online summary of the 4 arguments for malakoi and 8 for arsenokoitai, arguments which indicate that these terms are inclusive of adult-committed male homosexual relationships (point 4 here). I asked him if he would revise his article by at least responding to these arguments, heretofore ignored. He thanked me and did revise his article, but not in light of my arguments; rather, only in light of the comments that others, who were not scholars, left below his online article.
In his revision, he not only ignored my arguments, but he also mischaracterized an important scholar's view (William Loader) as supporting his (Gushee's) viewpoint and opposing mine (the exact opposite was the case). He added a reference from "biblical scholar Michael Vasey" about the cultural milieu. Yet Vasey, who was not a biblical scholar but a gay Anglican priest who died at age 52 (of HIV complications, according to some accounts), was oblivious to the evidence for committed homosexual relationships in the ancient world.
Dr. Gushee followed this with an over-reaching theological claim about Paul that is unsustainable from the evidence. He claimed that God's grace precludes the possibility that Paul could have warned sexual offenders, including homosexual offenders, about exclusion from God's kingdom. Yet Paul's offender list in 1 Cor 6:9-10 is precisely such a warning ("Stop deceiving yourselves: [The following] shall not inherit the kingdom of God"), where the larger context is the shocking case of a self-proclaimed Christian "brother" at Corinth in a sexual relationship with his stepmother (1 Cor 5). Paul has similar warnings to converts about sexual immorality sprinkled throughout most of his extant letters.
So I asked Dr. Gushee a second time through private FB messaging to respond to the many counterarguments that I offered. He sent me the message, "I appreciate your comments. Thank you.""
Gushee didn't respond.
(My mother and Father)
Influence is greater than numbers. The question is not, "How big is your church?" The real question is, "How is your church's influence?"
You could be twelve people, and salt the world with the good news of the Kingdom. You could be twelve hundred, and be an audience inside a saltshaker.
How is your influence going? Which way is it going?
Surely a loving God does not affirm everything.
Yale theologian Miroslav Volf personally witnessed the horrors of the Bosnian war. Out of this context he wrote,
I used to think that wrath was unworthy of God. Isn’t God love? Shouldn’t divine love be beyond wrath? God is love, and God loves every person and every creature. That’s exactly why God is wrathful against some of them. My last resistance to the idea of God’s wrath was a casualty of the war in former Yugoslavia, the region from which I come. According to some estimates, 200,000 people were killed and over 3,000,000 were displaced. My villages and cities were destroyed, my people shelled day in and day out, some of them brutalized beyond imagination, and I could not imagine God not being angry. Or think of Rwanda in the last decade of the past century, where 800,000 people were hacked to death in one hundred days!
How did God react to the carnage? By doting on the perpetrators in a grandparently fashion? By refusing to condemn the bloodbath but instead affirming the perpetrators basic goodness? Wasn’t God fiercely angry with them? Though I used to complain about the indecency of the idea of God’s wrath, I came to think that I would have to rebel against a God who wasn’t wrathful at the sight of the world’s evil. God isn’t wrathful in spite of being love. God is wrathful because God is love.
Volf, Free of Charge: Giving and Forgiving in a Culture Stripped of Grace, (Zondervan 2005) pp. 138-139

| synonyms: | pertinent, applicable, apposite, material, apropos, to the point, germane;
connected, related, linked;
on-topic
"the relevant page numbers"
|
Brothers and sisters, I do not consider myself
yet to have taken hold of it.
But one thing I do: Forgetting
what is behind and straining toward what is ahead,
I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which
God has called me heavenward in Christ
Jesus.
All of us, then, who are mature should take
such a view of things.
And if on some point you think
differently, that too God will make clear to you.
Philippians 3:13-15
When I was a campus pastor at Michigan State University in the 1980s I had many
meetings with new students. I would begin the conversation by asking them,
"Tell me, who are you?"
When I was a college freshman I could not answer this question. I think back
and remember how others viewed me. I was...
...drug user
...alcohol abuser
...failure
...party animal
...stupid
I didn't let others see my insides. Even if I wanted to reveal my heart I was
unable because I never addressed the self-question, never asked "Who am
I..., really?"
Looking back I see myself as...
...insecure
...lonely
...lacking confidence
...unaware
...easily manipulated
...phony
...duplicitous
...lost
Outwardly, especially when I was drunk, I celebrated who I was. Inwardly, the
party was over. I was mired in the Eriksonian "identity crisis," a prisoner
caught between ego identity and role confusion.
Looking back, should I have celebrated this? No way! Should I have
"accepted who I was?" No, thank God.
Don't celebrate who you are. Instead, look at what you were meant to be. You
need more change (as do I).
If you are a Jesus-follower celebrate Christ, not the "you" that you
are now. You have been purposed to be like Christ. He is the paradigm of true
humanity.
God wants to set you free from this world's current identity confusion. What
you can be and be transformed into is what matters, not the current
"you" that others or you think you are. This is no small matter. Your
answer to this will influence everything you do in life. And contrary to how
our identity-celebrating culture embraces this, it is not easy.
In the winter of 1970 I was on a stage in the Chicago area playing my guitar in
a band in front of a small crowd. That's when my release from who I was began.
The thought came to me, "I am screwed up." When I heard it I didn't
feel condemned. I felt truth. That's when the voices of friends who said they
liked "me" and thought I was "fun" began to lose their
influence.
Every rescue begins with repentance. A few days after this I looked away from
my self and began to look at Jesus. I was being set free, not to be who I was,
but what I was always meant to be.
Linda and I, over our fifty-thrree years of marriage, have met with many premarital; and marital couples. A percentage of these meetings concern couples who are talking about ending the marriage.
One resource we draw on is Gary Chapman's book One More Try: What to Do When Your Marriage Is Falling Apart.
Here's some wisdom from the book, which Linda and I share (as do many marital counselors).
"It has been said that unhappy marriages consist of unhappy people. You may not be able to change your spouse, but you can change yourself.
Marriages fail for three primary reasons:
lack of an intimate relationship with God,
lack of an intimate relationship with your mate,
or lack of an intimate understanding and acceptance of yourself.
One might think we would begin with our relationship to God, but the fact is, one’s relationship with God is greatly affected by one’s self-understanding. This time should be used as an opportunity to rediscover your own assets and liabilities as a person and to take positive steps in personal growth. Even if you are not separated but are struggling with a marriage in crisis, it is possible—indeed, necessary—to look deeply at yourself and begin to make some changes." (P. 41)
(In Kenya)
Thomas Merton wrote: "We have a vocation
not to be disturbed by the turmoil and wreckage of the great fabric of
illusions." (A Book of Hours, 56)
We have a vocation...
A calling. We have a calling.
From God. God calls us.
... not to be disturbed...
To not be agitated.
This is about the heart.
Washing machines have "agitators." They move back and forth, back and
forth, with force. They are going nowhere. They make no forward progress.
Disturbances halt forward progress. Disturbances interrupt the calling.
Jesus said, "Let not your hearts be agitated."
ταράσσω,v \{tar-as'-so}
1) to agitate, trouble (a thing, by the movement of its parts to and fro)
1a) to cause one inward commotion, take away his calmness of mind,
disturb his equanimity 1b) to disquiet, make restless 1c) to stir
up 1d) to trouble 1d1) to strike one's spirit with fear and
dread 1e) to render anxious or distressed 1f) to perplex the mind
of one by suggesting scruples or doubts
...by the turmoil...
Let not your hearts be agitated by the agitation. By the upheaval. By
the irruptions. By the roiling waters.
Let not your hearts be arrested by the peace-thieves.
...by the wreckage...
Do not be captivated by the incessant effluence of cultural carnage.
Put a compress on the bleeding media.
...the great fabric of illusions.
The systematic sham that is "the world."
With all its pretension and arrogance.
Do not let this world interpret you.
We have a calling from God to remain in Christ where agitation and turmoil
are not to be found and the great fabric of systemic spell-casting is broken.
Today I was reading some things about metaphors. My doctoral dissertation (450 pages!) was on metaphor theory. I spent six+ years writing it, in the days of no internet.
No AI, as well.
I was thinking, does AI know anything about my work in metaphor theory? I typed it into AI and got this.
***
Dr. John Piippo’s metaphor theory explores the nature of figurative and metaphorical truth, establishing that human experience cannot be fully contained by literal speech. Piippo, an American philosopher, theologian, and author, completed his doctoral dissertation on this exact subject at Northwestern University in 1986.